Gravity between two objects depends upon their masses and the distance between them.
You are asking this question because you are an intelligent person who is confused by the “non-intuitive” nature of the conflicting views of astro-physics these days. Basically, the mathematicians and physicists have become so contradictory and so hypothetical that nobody knows what is fact and what is fiction any more.
My first response is to remind you that most of what is taught and accepted as ‘fact’ today is pure conjecture without any means of confirmation. For example, people talk about ‘black holes’ which is a fundamental misnomer, because there is no ‘hole’ involved. Then people talk about ‘wormholes’ which do not exist at all, and no one has suggested that they do; simply that they ‘might’. And there is talk of ‘singularities’ which is real nonsense, believing that at the beginning of time, all the matter in the universe was concentrated into a point smaller than a micro-millimetre. Rubbish, really. And it is postulated (although Einstein disagreed) that all the mass within a black hole must collapse into a singularity, which is a concept created to explain the defects in the theory of gravitation that is currently propounded.
It’s no wonder that you, and tens of thousands of other intelligent people who ask questions in Quora are confused. The vast majority of what is spoken is theoretical nonsense no better than a vague possibility, if that.
What I want to do is show people that we don’t need to go to these silly lengths and theoretical imaginings to work out what is happening in the universe. So I have put together my theory of how gravitational force is created. No one else has ever produced such a theory, because Newton could not and did not, and Einstein could not and did not. Einstein just said that “curved spacetime is created by the existence of matter and the movement of matter along it is what gravity is.” And then he went on to produce mathematical formulae and theories to explain how matter behaves in response to gravity. Did you notice the trick there? He never explained exactly HOW the gravitational force was created. How, exactly, does the existence of matter bend the imaginary spacetime? And so on. This is the same sleight of hand that Newton used when he said that every atom in the universe is in direct attractive contact with every other atom. He never explained how that mechanism operated, nor how quickly”. And what he did, was the same as Einstein; he produced equations and rules that explained wonderfully how matter behaves in response to gravity, without being able to explain how gravitation force is created.