0 like 0 dislike
43 views
in History by (1.0m points)
Analyze the status of Aurangzeb in the history of the Subcontinent

1 Answer

0 like 0 dislike
by (1.0m points)
Historians do not often agree on much, least of all about South Asian history, but there seems to be an almost unanimous consensus that the downfall of the Mughal Empire should be blamed on Aurangzeb.

Most historians who study the Mughal Empire have sought to blame the sixth emperor entirely for its collapse, contrasting his religious conservatism with his great grandfather Akbar’s eclectic tolerance that undoubtedly led to architectural innovations and cultural synthesis during the latter’s reign. Those who admire the synergetic traditions that developed in Akbar’s court point to the stylistic fusion that took place in Fatehpur Sikri and to how some talented Hindus played an important role in his administration.

But even as Aurangzeb’s sectarian and messianic tendencies may have been the immediate catalyst for some of the rebellions that eventually triggered the downfall of the Mughal Empire, they should not be seen as the sole reasons for the empire’s disintegration. Challenges to Mughal rule had already begun right after Akbar’s military successes and historians, who write admiringly and uncritically about Akbar’s “secularism” and eclectic tastes and draw too sharp a distinction between Akbar and Aurangzeb, miss many such crucial points.

One of the points that these historians appear to overlook is that although most Mughals were consciously “secular”, at no point during their rule did they allot administrative posts in proportion to the actual population of Muslims and Hindus; Muslims were always over-represented. It is pertinent, then, that although Aurangzeb identified closely with Islamic orthodoxy, more Hindus were employed in his court than Akbar’s. Aurangzeb, like his predecessors, continued the practice of seeking alliances with Hindu rulers but he abandoned the practice of developing marital ties with them. This decision did come with a cost and it is true that without the bonds of inter-marriage and with a tax base that was becoming less stable, the motivation for the Rajputs to fight Mughal battles began to wane.

Related questions

0 like 0 dislike
0 answers 32 views
0 like 0 dislike
1 answer 41 views
0 like 0 dislike
1 answer 32 views
0 like 0 dislike
1 answer 112 views
0 like 0 dislike
1 answer 43 views
0 like 0 dislike
1 answer 38 views
0 like 0 dislike
1 answer 26 views
asked Dec 14, 2018 in History by danish (1.0m points)
0 like 0 dislike
0 answers 32 views
asked Nov 29, 2018 in History by danish (1.0m points)
0 like 0 dislike
1 answer 39 views
0 like 0 dislike
1 answer 59 views
asked Dec 28, 2018 in History by danish (1.0m points)
Welcome to Free Homework Help, where you can ask questions and receive answers from other members of the community. Anybody can ask a question. Anybody can answer. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top. Join them; it only takes a minute: School, College, University, Academy Free Homework Help

19.4k questions

18.3k answers

8.7k comments

3.3k users

Free Hit Counters
...